Universal Power by Desirée Delgado licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 Generic
Just like in TLL, there are some similarities and merged topics in SPS that are ideal for blogging. The following sociological analysis is based upon an article in the SPS anthology.
In one part of the article there was a historical analysis on women in West Africa, and I think it's so interesting that I couldn't wait a second to share it here. Unlike almost the rest of the world, in early West African tribes and colonies, women were dominant, and the society can be described as martiarchal, although the writers didn't mention so. Anyway, in those tribes, "women had their own fields and grew their own crops. They dominated the local markets and acquired considerable wealth from trade." Isn't this amazing? This is not all - since female gender was so important and valuable, men had to pay vast amounts of bridewealth as a compensation and the families were very reluctant to give away their daughters, and later on, if the wife rejected polygamy, the husband could definitely not marry any other person (who would accept it anyway?), but "women, for their part, had considerable freedom of movement to travel to market towns, where they often had extramarital affairs." Furthermore, people knew that having many daughters rather than sons was more valuable!
The girl in the image is almost certainly not a West African, but isn't it a great symbol to describe the female gender power in those societies? This cultural shock made me think of why and how gender inequalities have become so obvious. What is it that makes men desiring more and more strength, and playing down and tranquilizing the female gender?
The parts in the quotation marks were retrieved from Marvin Harris & Orna Johnson, Cultural Anthropology, (Allyn and Bacon, 2000)
(it is very challenging if not impossible to cite this in the APA format, sorry)
102-14. Our Blogging Queen
14 years ago